Analytic/Continental Dichotomy

(:title Analytic/Continental Dichotomy:)

Continental philosophers are the Dionysians, analytical philosophers the Apollonians.

It is telling that many continental philosophers became interested in philosophy through politics, finding philosophy necessary to explain the Good life. Their ideas often remain politically charged, as for better or worse continentals mean to live out what they write down. They can claim to be the heirs of Socrates, who was martyred for preaching in the Athenian marketplace.

Analytic philosophers entered philosophy troubled by the questions of doubt and perception. Can I trust what I see? Can I justify what I trust? Their risk aversion prevents them from grand philosophical claims and the heady demands of a philosophical vocation — most rarely venture beyond the level of critical commentary and careful analysis. They can claim to be the heirs of Aristotle, who founded a great university in Athens.

Analytic philosophers sacrifice philosophical highs and lows for the skeptic’s security in never making error. Continental philosophers risk everything and, more often than not, get immolated like a firefly drawn to the flame. As for me, I cannot decide whether I prefer the longevity of Aristotle or the passion of Socrates. The first is not really alive, but the second will not live long.